Browsed by
Author: Massimo Bergamini

GOVERNMENT AWOL AS CUTS TO REGIONAL AIR SERVICE THREATEN RECOVERY

GOVERNMENT AWOL AS CUTS TO REGIONAL AIR SERVICE THREATEN RECOVERY

Air Canada ExpressWith Air Canada forecasting in July it would continue burning through cash reserves at the rate of between $15 and $ 17 million per day if its medium-term outlook did not improve, the decision, announced last week, that it was planning additional cuts to air service in Atlantic Canada was predictable.

The real surprise was not Air Canada’s  announcement, but that the federal government would continue sitting on its hands, as it has since the start of the pandemic, while regional air service is slashed.

And make no mistake; this is not an Atlantic Canada issue. It is a national issue that, if left unaddressed, will linger painfully for months after the coronavirus vaccine starts kindling a return to economic and social normalcy in Canada’s largest urban centres.

On top of massive restructuring measures, including laying off thousands of workers and parking billions of dollars’ worth of aircraft equipment, both Air Canada and WestJet have been shedding domestic capacity for months in an effort to weather the pandemic storm.

Whether it be northern Ontario and Quebec, the interior of British Columbia, or Atlantic Canada, if not addressed quickly, the economic and social fallout from cuts to regional air service will cast a dark cloud on the prospects of a speedy post-pandemic recovery in those regions.

The reasons are rooted in the economic, operational and competitive reality of commercial aviation.

First, regional routes are generally less profitable than long haul domestic or international flights because carriers’ fixed costs are amortized over a smaller number of passengers per mile than on long haul flights that use larger and more fuel-efficient aircraft.

Second, Canada’s domestic industry is currently operating at a fraction of its normal capacity.  It will take time – months, if not longer — before it is back to full strength.

Getting airline capacity back to where it was a year ago will mean bringing back thousands of furloughed employees and dozens of planes that were grounded in the wake of the pandemic.

Many airline employees such as pilots, will need to be recertified, while others will require additional training to deal with things such as health and safety policies introduced after their layoff.  This will take time.

Then there’s the matter of bringing the fleet back online.  You can’t just take a $ 150 million aircraft that’s been on blocks for a few months, taxi to the gate and say welcome aboard.

Planes that have been sitting idle for any length of time will need to undergo nose-to-tail inspections that can each take days and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars before they’re deemed airworthy again. This too takes time.

Finally, while our domestic carriers will be busy gearing up for the anticipated uptick in economic activity and travel next fall, they will also have to be mindful of competition from foreign carriers – including US carriers – that have enjoyed massive government assistance that has given them a capacity advantage and enhanced their ability to cherry-pick the Canadian marketplace.

No one should be surprised when Canadian carriers this fall allocate all available capacity — equipment and staff — to serve their large domestic hubs to take advantage of the long-awaited domestic recovery and safeguard market share from foreign competition.

And no one should be surprised when smaller communities in Atlantic Canada, northern Ontario, northern Quebec, western Canada and in the interior of BC are left out in the cold – again – as the rest of the country starts to pick itself up from the pandemic winter.

The inescapable truth is that government inaction in addressing the unprecedented crisis faced by our air transportation sector will only make regional inequalities worse and accelerate the exodus of residents from regional centres.

Fortunately, mitigating its impact won’t require complex policy solutions – only political will.

First it requires the political will to acknowledge that while assisting air carriers during a global pandemic may not be woke, it is nonetheless necessary.

Then it requires the political will to acknowledge that this crisis is made worse by government user pay policies that syphon billions of dollars from air travellers and airlines each year to pay for airport infrastructure, air navigation and airport security.

Finally it requires the political will to act by providing liquidity assistance for carriers, and cutting the taxes and third party charges that weigh down their air operations like so much ballast.

If the government of Canada continues to avoid addressing these issues, for many – particularly young people — whether in Atlantic Canada or northern Quebec, or any other region that fears seeing its local airport shuttered long after the rest of the country opens up, their next flight could be a one-way ticket out.

Related content: Covid Crisis an Opportunity to Reimagine Air Travel 

COVID CRISIS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENTS TO REIMAGINE AIR TRAVEL

COVID CRISIS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INDUSTRY AND GOVERNMENTS TO REIMAGINE AIR TRAVEL

Transport Minister Marc GarneauThis column first appeared in National NewsWatch

With Canada’s commercial aviation industry bleeding red ink and with parts of the sector on the verge of collapse, Transport Minister Marc Garneau this weekend announced that discussions with industry representatives on an assistance package would soon begin.

The announcement was welcomed by airlines, airports, and their employees who had for months been calling on Ottawa to step up to help their industry, which the minister has acknowledged had been “hit…harder than any other” by the pandemic.

But with the announcement coming in the wake of Prime Minister Trudeau’s warning to provincial premiers and mayors to impose more restrictions to slow the current rise in COVID-19 cases, and “do the right thing”, the celebrations risk being short-lived.

In issuing his call for vigilance and caution to premiers and mayors, it is likely the Prime Minister was also urging individual Canadians and the country’s business community to show patience and not put undue pressure on governments to open things up.

The recent spike in COVID-19 cases in Canada may not be as steep as that experienced in Europe and in the United States, but with universally available vaccines months away, we know that the virus and government mitigation measures will be with us well into 2021.

So what does this tell us about the assistance package promised by the transport minister?

First it tells us that whatever assistance measures are eventually announced by the federal government, they will be framed by the public health imperative to minimize coronavirus transmission.

Recent polls that show a growing number of Canadians who expect things to get worse before they get better will only serve to bolster the government’s resolve.

Meanwhile, the airline industry has been pushing rapid COVID-testing as a way to reduce quarantine time for international passengers along with air traveller anxiety about the risk of contracting the virus and promoting it on social media using the hash tag #TimeToTravel.

This is not to say that no additional public health measures to facilitate and encourage air travel will be introduced, only that these will likely be limited in scope.

It is possible that a pilot program underway at Calgary airport aiming to evaluate COVID testing for international travellers as a safe alternative to the current 14-day quarantine requirement could, if successful, be expanded to other airports.

But it also means that, while of value in reducing passenger health concerns, industry efforts to expand the use of rapid airport testing for domestic flights will likely not be successful in quickly reducing government restrictions currently in place on domestic travel.

Second, it tells us that short-term transition measures alone will not be sufficient to put the aviation industry on a path to sustainable recovery.

The latest Stats Canada aviation industry report shows an uptick in travel in the month of August – typically the best month for the industry — but also shows total traffic falling by 87 percent over the same period last year.

Most industry experts agree that it will take years to bring passenger levels back to what they were pre-pandemic.

Nicholas Calio, chief executive of Airlines for America, says it’s unlikely air travel in the U.S. will return to pre-pandemic levels before 2024, a perspective echoed last June by the International Air Transportation Association (IATA).

Liquidity assistance in the form of low-interest loans, floated recently as a likely component of a federal assistance package, is a good transitional step but it will have to be supplemented by additional short-term measures and more importantly, changes to Canada’s user pay policies.

The impact of user pay policies on the competitiveness of Canada’s airline industry has been well documented over the years, including in the 2016 Canada Transportation Act Review – better known as the Emerson report.

The pandemic and the federal government’s reluctance to match the assistance provided to their aviation sector by other countries have exacerbated the competitive imbalance and risk crystallizing market dislocation for years.

Canada’s aviation user pay policy generates a healthy windfall for the federal government, but it also penalizes travellers, particularly those from smaller or remote centres, by increasing the cost of air travel and making service to their communities more vulnerable.

Minister Garneau said he wants his assistance package to ensure “Canadians and regional communities retain air connections to the rest of Canada”.

But the only way to achieve this — short of turning the assistance program into a commercial straight jacket or re-regulating the industry — will be by providing additional price latitude to carriers in the short and medium term.

In other words, by opting for market driven solutions.

The government can do this by abandoning or curtailing for a few years certain revenue streams, such as airport rents and subsidizing the costs of air traffic control and airport security screening – now paid in their entirety by air carriers and travellers — like many other countries do.

This would immediately reduce carrier operating costs and lower the per-flight break-even point, and would also eliminate from the price of a ticket those costs the government now charges travellers for their security screening.

If coupled with short-term liquidity assistance, such an approach would give air carriers additional room to adjust their pricing structures to begin growing demand while also reducing their cost disadvantage vis-à-vis foreign competitors.

Noted American economist Paul Romer once remarked that a crisis was a terrible thing to waste.

Navigating this crisis will require vision and daring by both industry leaders and governments, and carries no guarantee of success. But it also provides an historic opportunity for industry and governments to work together to fix longstanding issues and imagine a pathway toward more competitive, efficient and safe air travel for all Canadians.

It is an opportunity that must not be wasted.

Related content: Government Awol as Cuts to Regional Air Service Threaten Recovery